I’m so grateful to Ben Goodwin & Amanda Choy who helped me collate the Threatened and At Risk species of the Tāmaki Estuary for the Tāmaki Estuary Protection Society.
Kina infographic for Hauturu
First look at the Bream Bay sand mining area
When I saw the proposed new Fast-track sand mine in Bream Bay placed on a map by Marc Daalder I thought I would have a look at the site.
I launched my kayak from Uretiti Beach and paddled 6.5 km to the site. On the way I paused six times to drop a weighted GoPro on timelapse from a dive line to photograph the seafloor. I then paddled South West of the mining site and took 12 more photos in a 1km North East transect.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf940/cf940ec4e556c444dfdb505a5c7d53c8c9b57291" alt=""
I was not expecting to see much benthic biodiversity as the area is frequently trawled. However I was very pleased to find extensive non-calcareous tubeworm fields (Spionidae – I think) in half the photos, mostly at the north-eastern end of the transect. The filter-feeding tubeworms are a good sign the seafloor is stable and able to support even more complex biogenic habitats if trawling pressure was removed. (Sand mining directly and indirectly impacts biogenic habits, these complex 3D structures made by life on the seafloor are easily buried by unstable substrate.) The tubeworm fields are also associated with tipa / scallops. I was only clearly able to identify one live tipa in the 12 photos but tipa shells were a common feature of the area.
It was a quiet afternoon on the surface with no workups seen, however single tākapu / gannets were working the area, I counted five kororā / little penguin on the way to the site and a tight ball of forage fish.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62df/c62dfb62dda390d64f4d8562e6de9ffe99c4ca02" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fa2f/3fa2fc6f551c4220da1fa831c531890e7f849c14" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b7d1/3b7d19ffe96e76927847a2281cbb90a3734d1724" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa76b/aa76b6d646c460bb0c4de3cca1ad38097e1852e1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3451e/3451e114311091bc725dbfdedc0bd13225dac75e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/329bd/329bd1bc41cd95acd3b292a7b3b52db4f5738c3c" alt=""
Healthier waterways graphics
Artificial Reef or Fish Aggregation Device?
Artificial reefs have significant potential to boost fish populations, even surpassing pre-fished levels or what is possible in marine reserves. However they have a checkered history overseas, with many reefs:
- Failing to restore native biodiversity to levels of those of conserved natural reefs (Bracho-Villavicencio et al. 2023).
- Creating hard surfaces which are favoured by invasive species (these species often travel to new areas on hard structures) (Gauff et al. 2023).
- Created as a convenient way to dispose of something which pollutes the marine environment (E.g. UnderwaterTimes.com 2006). They can also attract polluting activities (Zhang et al. 2019).
When considering building an artificial reef, it is crucial to determine whether it will provide additional habitat to support reef communities or merely function as a Fish Aggregation Device (FAD). Like artificial reefs, FADs are man-made structures which are attract fish to a specific area by providing habitat and shelter for marine life. The problem with FADs is that they decrease local fish populations by concentrating them in one area where they are easily targeted by fishers (Cabral et al. 2014) as illustrated below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/426b7/426b7e1f3fbd27675f54e49a194e4489020889e6" alt=""
To define the size of the habitat required to avoid FAD functionality, you could base it on the home range of each fish species you want to increase. For example:
The most studied fish in the Hauraki Gulf is the tāmure / snapper, which show high site fidelity to reef habitats. Tāmure in deep soft sediment habitats are quite mobile, with a median distance of 19 km, and some movements up to 400 km. In contrast tāmure in shallow rocky reef habitats have restricted movements, with a median distance of 0.7 km (Parsons et al. 2011). You can see this in small marine reserves with shallow rock reefs, such as the 5 km² Cape Rodney – Okakari Point Marine Reserve (Goat Island), which effectively increase the size and abundance of this species. Additionally, tāmure around mussel farms have been found to be healthier than those in surrounding soft sediment habitats (Underwood 2023). The studied mussel farms were near rocky reefs and covered about eight hectares (200 x 400m).
This means fished artificial reefs should be deployed at hectare scales to avoid acting as population sinks. For tāmure, an area about the size of eight rugby fields is a considerable undertaking, but to avoid your reef functioning as a FAD for fishing, it is essential to spread your structure over a large area. If this sounds more like ‘habitat enhancement’ than an artificial reef, then perhaps that is a better way to frame your design. Of course, this consideration is unnecessary if your artificial reef is not fished.
REFERNCES
Bracho-Villavicencio et al., 2023 https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10070121 A Review of the State of the Art and a Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness for the Restoration of Marine Ecosystems. Environments.
Cabral et al., 2014 https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/71/7/1750/664488 Modelling the impacts of fish aggregating devices (FADs) and fish enhancing devices (FEDs) and their implications for managing small-scale fishery
Gauff et al., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2023.151882
Unexpected biotic homogenization masks the effect of a pollution gradient on local variability of community structure in a marine urban environment.
Parsons et al., 2003 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225304000_Snapper_Pagrus_auratus_Sparidae_home_range_dynamics_Acoustic_tagging_studies_in_a_marine_reserve Snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) home range dynamics: Acoustic tagging studies in a marine reserve
UnderwaterTimes.com 2006
https://web.archive.org/web/20170912095117/https://www.underwatertimes.com/news.php?article_id=36210951740 Two Million Tire Artificial Reef to be Removed Off Florida Coast; Smothering Corals
Underwood et al., 2023 https://www.aquaculturescience.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/aquaculture/AquacultureHabitatComparativeReport.pdf Habitat value of green-lipped mussel farms for fish in northern Aotearoa New Zealand
Zhang et al., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134768
Microplastic pollution in water, sediment, and fish from artificial reefs around the Ma’an Archipelago, Shengsi, China.
Record oystercatcher chick at Tahuna Torea
This summer Tōrea pango / Variable Oystercatcher have nested for the first time at Tahuna Torea Nature Reserve (written records began in the 1970’s). Its also the first time any bird has nested on the man-made shorebird roosts (or islands) in the lagoon. Tōrea Pango are recovering from being threatened with extinction and are one of the most endangered breeding birds in the Eastern Songbird Project area. The nearest breeding area is Motukorea / Browns Island which is a population sink for the species. The reserves name ‘torea’ does not come from this species but the South Island Pied Oystercatcher which once gathered here in great numbers.
The two egg nest was laid days after I trimmed the vegetation on Kuaka Island mid November 2023 as part of a roost restoration project. A team of local bird watchers kept a close eye on the nest. The mud in the lagoon keeps the cats out, but not the rats, the trapping team stepped up efforts and rats stopped turning up on the trail camera. One of the eggs was not fertile but the other one was and the bird watching team was thrilled when a chick hatched just in time for Christmas.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2859/a28590edfe5ccac167ace1d12265857e9a47d0a2" alt=""
The nest would not likely have survived a kiteboarding event in the lagoon. Thanks to the kiteboarders for volunteering to stop kiting in the lagoon at high tide. If you do see anyone kiting in the lagoon phone me 021 555 425 and I’ll have a chat to them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/048df/048df7542b0fa4578c33d2e1edd4a3d5705940ba" alt=""
It was interesting that after nesting on Kuaka Island where I had trimmed vegetation and where a small amount of mangroves have been removed (not the majority) the parents then took the chick 400 m southeast to Cable Beacon Point. New mangrove stumps here were used by the chick to hide. I put up a sign and the bird watchers were on high alert for a few weeks until the chick fledged. The Tōrea pango whanau have stayed in the area which is a great endorsement of the reserve from our feathered friends and a huge win for our shorebird habitat restoration efforts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90407/90407e2eaa25657d77c118acc78d61681a699bd5" alt=""
The unmanaged fisheries of the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park
In New Zealand, we have 75 fish populations that are supposed to be managed sustainably. The main way we do this is by setting limits on how many fish can be caught, known as the Total Allowable Catch (TAC). We don’t keep regular track of the fish caught by recreational and cultural fishers. The only annual numbers are for commercial fishing, which has a limit called the Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC).
What’s puzzling is that for many fish populations, the TACC is set way higher than what’s actually being caught, and it’s been like that for years without any change. To me, this means these fish aren’t really being managed at all. Of the 75 in Aotearoa there are 16 fish populations in the Gulf that stand out as ‘unmanaged’ due to their TACC being significantly higher than the actual catches.
I had high hopes for the new Fisheries Management Plan for the Gulf, thinking it might sort out these unmanaged populations. I tried to get some answers by writing to the minister, and when that didn’t work, I filed an Official Information Act request. The reply came from Simon Lawrence at Fisheries New Zealand, but it wasn’t what I hoped for. They’re only planning to review four out of the 16 unmanaged populations this year – Flatfish, Rig, Blue cod, and Red cod. That leaves Pipi, Horse mussel, Paddle crab, Anchovy, Sprat, Pilchard, Jack mackerel, Pōrae, Leatherjacket, Trumpeter, Longfin eel and Spiny dogfish unmanaged. Four of these fish are at the bottom of the food web and are critical for the Gulf ecosystem function. Horse mussels are endemic (found only in New Zealand) and aggregations dense enough to be called beds are now extinct in the Gulf, Longfin eel are also endemic and going extinct.
So here we are, with a fisheries plan that talks a big game about moving towards an ‘ecosystem-based fisheries management‘ approach, but we’re not even effectively managing individual fish populations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ab9/12ab98e8517d2b028f5fc5ee1d53c29562336aac" alt="Anchovy Engraulis australis kokowhaawhaa"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98887/988876aa82537213b73c44bbe5129fe509f807f8" alt="Jack mackerel Trachurus declivis Trachurus novaezelandia Trachurus murphyi Haature"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df997/df997f2bbb9c91b2d90c5671ce357dff59962ad3" alt="New Zealand pilchard Sardinops sagax Mohimohi"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/340c5/340c57b1d383cefaba3021f55c82fad08cb4f0c7" alt="New Zealand sprat Sprattus muelleri Kupae"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddb29/ddb29236dc37a61eea74b53c85b53eae1c0c4390" alt="Smooth leatherjacket velvet leatherjacket Meuschenia scaber Kokiri"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00b55/00b557794b354b08e27c2641229a536f7ca0c445" alt="Trumpeter Latris lineata Kohikohi"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56d2c/56d2ce057444fd74ef122c9f736d935447f51139" alt="Porae Nemadactylus douglasii Morwong"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be65c/be65caa8a2cb1fda08fbdfbfcbc508da2a445613" alt="Spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias snow fillets Makohuarau Pioke"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6850/c68500e08c64687d09d94da2908706175516e2de" alt="Longfin eel Anguilla dieffenbachii Tuna"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e621/8e6213687153fe465cb17d2beac4c8245f378944" alt="paddle crab Ovalipes catharus Pāpaka"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d06/48d067f6933ad042ded3d5aa57c3e933c240ac94" alt="horse mussel Atrina zelandica Hururoa"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b90f3/b90f3ce6cf1900f1ed7851ebe040697d12a12ba4" alt="pipi Paphies australis"
New Zealand’s dairy industry
Environmental reports and main stream media are often critical of different aspects of the New Zealand dairy industry. Here I summarise them together in one graphic. View at higher resolution by clicking on the image below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dd5a/9dd5a1e715e55f65116aebfee5348f620043f212" alt=""
References – resources for further reading on the impacts of New Zealand’s dairy industry.
- Blood phosphate from occupied Western Sahara
- Urea (synthetic fertiliser) made from fossil fuels
- Up to 11,000 L of water to make 1 L of milk
- Industrial irrigation
- 2 million calves removed from mothers and killed every year
- Palm kernel replaces wildlife habitat overseas
- Winter grazing (mud farming)
- Methane burps
- Climate heating
- 65% of milk dried with fossil fuels. Math: In 2022 95% of dairy exported, 68.24% was milk powder. Milk powder is dried using coal, natural gas and a small amount of diesel or liquid fuel. There is a tiny amount of geothermal used, the industry is investing in wood pellet fired boilers.
- Turned into junk food overseas. Nestlé is Fonterra’s largest customer. I recommend you do your own research into products which use milk powder as an ingredient and decide if they fit your definition of junk food or not.
- Nitrogen increases bowel cancer in New Zealanders
- Cow sewage & fertiliser cause algal blooms which kill animals
- 60% of NZ rivers not swimmable
Map of dog prohibited area at Tahuna Torea Nature Reserve
Like many locals I regularly ask people to not walk their dog at Tahuna Torea Nature Reserve. Sometimes dog walkers push back and say they are allowed to walk their dogs on the beach or around the top of the track. To make it clear here is the wording from the Auckland Council website:
Here is a map to visually explain the area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66f0c/66f0c78899b3c4c2028c11a83a7a742220b9e6e8" alt=""
To map the “beach and foreshore areas”, I projected the boundaries perpendicular to the starting points on land, down to the low tide line. Mean Low Water Springs (MLWS) has been visually estimated.
Update March 2024
Roberta Reserve also excludes dogs on the foreshore and playground. There is an exemption for the area in the water of the stream mouth seaward side of the bridge on Roberta Reserve.
Submissions on the protections proposed by Revitalising the Gulf
I spent a few days going through the 7,550 submissions on protections proposed by Revitalising the Gulf. I’m estimating 77%-90% of the submissions were positive about the protection proposals. However huge numbers concerned about the continuation of bottom impact fishing outside the protected areas and cultural take inside them. So there is a general need for more protection. This level of public support for marine protection can be expected and can be seen in Polling from the Hauraki Gulf Form, Submissions on the recent Waiheke Marine Reserve Proposal and the Live Ocean Barometer 2023.
Most of the names were redacted from the submissions but the organisation names were left public. Here are the names of the organisations that made significant submissions.
OPPOSED | PARTIALLY SUPPORT | SUPPORT |
Legasea 2xs Charters / Balmain Boating Services Alan Seasprite Charters CRA 2 Rock Lobster Management Co Dr Hook Charters Fisheries Inshore NZ Kina Industry Council Mercury Bay Game Fishing Club NZ Rock Lobster Industry Council New Zealand Charter Boat Association New Zealand Sport Fishing Council Paua Industry Council Princess Carol Charters Provider Adventures Ltd Sea Urchin NZ Ltd Seahawk Fishing Charters Slipper Island Residents Association Snap Attack Specialty & Emerging Fisheries Group Tairua Adventures Ltd / Artisan Fishing Co Te Ohu Kaimoana Te Ra Charters The New Zealand Angling & Casting Association Whitianga / Coromandel Peninsula Commercial Fisherman’s Association |
Aldermen Islands Marine Reserve Group Friends of the Hauraki Gulf Mama Fish Sanford Limited |
Forest & Bird Revive Our Gulf Auckland City Centre Residents Group Auckland Conservation Board Auckland Council Auckland Sea Kayaks Auckland Sea Shuttles Coromandel Marine Farmers Association Devonport Yacht Club Environmental Defence Society Foundation North Friends of Taputeranga Marine Reserve Trust Goat Island Dive and Snorkel Good Fishing Hahei Residents and Ratepayers Association Leigh Penguin Project Live Ocean Foundation Meadowbank School Marine team Motuora Restoration Society Mountains to Sea Conservation Trust New Zealand Conservation Authority New Zealand Geographic New Zealand Marine Sciences Society Ngāti Hei Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust Ocean Voyages Inc Pakiri Community Landcare Group Pest Free Kaipātiki Ports of Auckland Limited Shakespear Open Sanctuary Society Inc Sir Peter Blake MERC Stet Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi Te Whanau o Pākiri The Friends of Te Whanganui‐A‐Hei Marine Reserve Trust The Glass Bottom Boat Whitianga The Hauraki Gulf Conservation Trust The Hauturu Supporters Trust Tāmaki Estuary Protection Society Tāwharanui Open Sanctuary Society Inc Waiheke Marine Project Waikato Regional Council Wakatere Boating Club Yachting New Zealand |
Most of these submitters were upset about continued bottom impact fishing in the Gulf. Most of the Charter fishers all sent in the same submission. | These submitters indicated support for marine protection but did not express that much support for the proposed measures: | Most of these submitters wanted more protection than what was proposed and also wanted bottom impact fishing banned. |
I have not published the names of many organisations who used the LegaSea form as those submissions contained dramatically less information than those from the above organisations. They were mostly small owner operator companies who are also keen fishers. The big Purse Sein operator Pelco NZ Ltd and Te Ahu wai o Tangaroa sustainable ecological aquaculture did make significant submissions but they did not speak to the protection proposal.
In response to the submissions the Department of Conservation has reduced the amount of protection. Submissions are now open on the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill.
P.S. These bottom impact fishing effort maps were made public by Fisheries Inshore NZ and are useful in considering the proposed ‘trawl corridoors’.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72449/724490151abec0a9ff5bda8a878439430eef867a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ba69/5ba699b765bb4850d53c7c647b8631d178d0e5eb" alt=""